Analyzing Michael Moore's 'Sicko' as a Healthcare Film
734 WordsJan 16th, 20183 Pages
The Michael Moore movie pointed to a myriad of issues relating to the American healthcare system that are both startling and interesting. The movie was produced before the Obama Administration signed the Affordable Care Act into law, but Sicko reports that nearly 50 million Americans do not have health insurance. About 18,000 Americans die each year because they don't have health insurance. The system is clearly broken, and politics seems to have been the reason that insurance companies keep a strangle hold on consumers. For example, Sicko reports that there are nearly four times as many lobbyists in Washington D.C. pushing for their clients' agenda as there are members of Congress.
Also, the insurance and healthcare industry donated $14 million to members of Congress who helped to pass the Medicare Part D legislation. That is the legislation that gives breaks to senior citizens for their prescription medicines. Moore's movie said that Medicare Part D will end up giving (over ten years from 2006 to 2016) up to $800 billion "tax dollars" to the health insurance industry. And if Moore's movie is correct, older people on Medicare will wind up actually paying more for their prescription drugs than they paid prior to Part D of Medicare. Moore uses a projection with math formulas to come up with that dollar figure.
What issues/trends are portrayed and is this an…
In the documentary Sicko, Michael Moore exposes the dysfunctional North American healthcare system. His documentary focuses on the corruption, the political agenda, and comparing the American healthcare systems compared to others. Moore informs American audiences of the true motives behind the billion dollar industry that is the health care system.
The main point that Michael Moore is portraying in his documentary is that the North American health care system does not have the best interest for it’s customers in mind. Throughout the documentary, Moore gives numerous examples of insured patients being denied a multitude of treatments from their insurance companies. They are denied because of the amount their treatments would cost the insurance company. These thousands of Americans pay monthly for their health insurance so that they will be covered in instances like these. Health insurance companies, such as Kaiser, refuse to pay for treatments (for their paying customers) if they deem the cost of the treatment too hefty. Moore’s point of his documentary is to draw attention the corruption of the health care companies in North America.
The corruption of the health insurance companies go beyond the denial of treatment for its patients. Moore builds a strong argument for the healthcare systems of other nations such as Canada, and France. He builds a very convincing argument, however; Moore plays on the emotions and uses pathos to strengthen his arguments rather than reason. Many of the examples that Moore uses in his documentary are very dire cases of helpless families that are refused treatments from their health care providers. Instead of choosing examples that the average Americans may face, Moore uses extreme cases to play on the emotions of his audience to more effectively get his point across.
He uses many dramatic effects such as interviewing family members of a patient that is not being granted treatment to more fully add emotion to the documentary. Moore also uses cases of elderly patients and veteran further add dramatic effect. Overall, Moore persuades the audience on his argument as opposed to using reason to convince his audience. His style is effective for playing on the audience’s emotions by using dramatic effect. The documentary supports its arguments using emotions to persuade rather logic and reason to convince.
The purpose of Michael Moore’s gut-wrenching documentary Sicko was to inform the audience of the corruption of the North American health care system. It also persuades the audience that a socialistic system of health care is more beneficial to the patient. Moore’s documentary contains multiple examples of the corruption of the health care providers in America. For example, a firefighter was denied coverage by his health insurance after he was injured rescuing people in 9/11. There are many other cases featured in the documentary of insured people being denied coverage. Moore also shows the political side of the health care providers.
He explains that healthcare companies sponsor politicians that will be beneficial to their companies if elected. Moore uses this information to inform his audience, however; throughout the documentary Moore compares the American capitalistic health system with other countries’ socialistic systems. After informing the audience of a patient being denied treatment, Moore gives an example of the free healthcare in other countries. For example, Moore shows a man visiting Europe that broke his arm and was treated for free under the socialistic healthcare system. Michael Moore’s purpose in making this documentary was to inform and persuade the audience of the corruption of the American Health care system.
This documentary was very interesting for me. The healthcare system in America is controversial right now and it is a topic I am still trying to understand myself. While this documentary did clarify some confusion for me, it did not remove it all together. Moore was very convincing in his arguments, but they were flawed. He is biased toward the socialistic healthcare system and did not portray any negative effects or circumstances with the socialistic system. The documentary contains extreme examples of patients not being insured that are not that relate able as an audience member. Sicko by Michael Moore is a moving and poignant documentary, but it is also biased and his persuasion tactics are easy to identify.